<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Bench Memos</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/</link>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>benchmemos@nationalreview.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T08:37:20-05:00</dc:date>
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>


<item>
<title>Yes, It&#39;s Really Our Birthday</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjBjYzg1ZjRlNGE2MzIxYTA4NmNhMDAxMDdhMjQ4YjM=</link>
<description>Over at The Corner, Jonah points us to a piece by historian Joseph Ellis at The Daily Beast about what really happened on July 4, 1776.nbsp; The short... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T08:37:20-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>This Day in Liberal Judicial ActivismJuly 4</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NWZjZTExZjk0MDQwNTUyMTliYmI0ODY1OTE5OWNmODk=</link>
<description>1776mdash;The Declaration of Independence is a stirring statement of Americarsquo;s creed, but is it also a sexist and xenophobic document?nbsp; Defen... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-04T08:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Indeterminacy</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmNkYTE5Mjg1NDM0OWQwZGQ4ODhiNzhiMDIyZDMxNzY=</link>
<description>The basic concept which lies at the heart of my point about Congress, courts and the Fourteenth Amendment is indeterminacy. Consider as examples some ... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-03T12:05:43-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Still More on the Courts and Equal Protection</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NzI1YzljMDQ0NWI5Yzc0NDQzN2Y3MmU4MWY1MDM0NmM=</link>
<description>Professor Bradley, I think your last post nicely illuminates our disagreement, but Irsquo;m having trouble seeing the grounds for the asymmetry that y... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T18:13:10-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ambassador Kmiec</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTRhYWQyYzRiZTBiNjAzMTg1ODNlYzY4NTFlZjNmYmE=</link>
<description>Well, Douglas Kmiec won&#39;t get a judicial nomination in return for supporting Barack Obama, but he is going to become the Ambassador to Malta. . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T16:26:04-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>More on EPC and the Courts</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=Y2JiYjk3MzMwNmZmNjFjODhiOGFlYzM5NTZkYTc2YjE=</link>
<description>Anthony supplies some needed balance and context to the remarks I posted yesterday. I surely agree with him that, from my remarks, it does not follow ... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T15:23:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: EPC and the Courts</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDZjN2VmODE1Y2Q5YzMxMzAzN2U0YzBmZDZhOGIyZmI=</link>
<description>Professor Bradley, your input is very welcome. I donrsquo;t think the historical record is so clear that the ratifiers of the Fourteenth Amendment wan... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T13:25:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Public Support for Sotomayor Falls After Supreme ...</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmZlYTgwY2IxNmY2ZjcwM2JiZDI3NTY4YWMzODdkNDA=</link>
<description>Thatrsquo;s the headline from Rasmussen Reports on its analysis of its latest survey of public opinion on the Sotomayor nomination.nbsp; Even more str... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-02T10:19:19-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>EPC and Colorblindness</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTcwNmE0OTY3NzA1OWZjZmJlZjgyZTE1ZWVkYjFlNzA=</link>
<description>To the very useful exchange in progress between Anthony and Ramesh I would add an invitation to anyone who considers the question to un-learn their co... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T16:34:39-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:  Judge Sotomayors Misreliance on Foreign and ...</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjgzNDdjOTIzNTY1MTg2ZTlhMjc3MTRkMDc3N2VlOWI=</link>
<description>Two weeks ago, I discussed Judge Sotomayorrsquo;s terribly muddled April 2009 speech in which she offers a blanket defense of freewheeling resort to f... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T15:49:51-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Judicial Power in a Fallen World</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmQ5YWM5ZGM1ODYxMzBhNGI0YmQ2ZmRhZjA2MjhjNTU=</link>
<description>Ramesh, Irsquo;m open to taking into account the background assumptions of the framers concerning the scope of the judicial power. I donrsquo;t think ... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T14:48:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Playing the Quota Game</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODVjZDA5NzY1Y2VjYmQ0ZTExNzQyNGM2NTdmYTU4ZmI=</link>
<description>In her notorious 2001 Berkeley speech titled ldquo;A Latina Judgersquo;s Voice,rdquo; Judge Sotomayor discussed what she called ldquo;Latino represent... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-07-01T11:14:04-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Has Justice Souter Actually Retired?</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OGRhMmM1ZDcxYzFlNmM3NTljOTBhZWE3NmFmNmQ3Yjg=</link>
<description>I got some grief four years ago, on the occasion of Justice O&#39;Connor&#39;s announced intention to retire, when I argued that until she was gone for keeps ... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T17:56:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Colorblindness, Again</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZThmNjY3OTJmNTZlZmZiNDg1YjRjYTBiMWM3NGFiYjM=</link>
<description>Anthony, I believe you are reading the narrow interpretation Bradley mentioned too narrowly. There&#39;s no reason to assume a limitation to physical dama... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T15:31:28-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The Colorblind Constitution</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZjI2YzZjM2FkNzNkN2NkMDhjOWM4ZTNjNWQ1NjQ5OWE=</link>
<description>Ramesh, Judge McConnellrsquo;s article doesnrsquo;t explicitly say that the Fourteenth Amendment commands colorblindness, but I think the clear implic... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T13:18:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Has Justice Souter Actually Retired?</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzY3Yzc5OWJkMzg2YzBiNjI2MWU5YjI5ZDc3NTMzNjI=</link>
<description>On May 1, Justice Souter sent a letter to President Obama in which he stated, ldquo;When the Supreme Court rises for the summer recess this year, I in... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T11:35:57-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sotomayor may sue SCOTUS for overturning New Have...</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDI2OGFhMTA4MmZkODVmOWNhYjgxNWZmMWMxMGMwMjk=</link>
<description>Well, only in Scrapplefacersquo;s world of parody. . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T11:00:13-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:  Sotomayor Vindicated?</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OGYxZjJiMmU4MWI0MTQzYWI5YTg5ZmU4ODhkMjY3ZmE=</link>
<description>A follow-up to this post of mine, which passed along the contention by Sotomayor supporters that her position and that of Justice Ginsburg and the oth... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-30T07:21:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Colorblind Constitution</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDRlZDE0ZmNjNDExOTZmZjMyZTNmODIxOGM2NTBlNmI=</link>
<description>Anthony, you write, &#34;But I do think there are good-faith originalist arguments that the EPC commands colorblindness, andnbsp;I don&#39;t take it that your... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-29T21:24:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Colorblind Constitution</title>
<link>http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=OGEzOGRmYjg1NjNkMzYzYWRlYWMzZjc4ZDZkZDI1ZTI=</link>
<description>Ramesh, it seems to me that the Equal Protection Clause is one of many examples of a constitutional provision whose precise meaning is probably indete... . . .</description>
<dc:date>2009-06-29T18:44:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>