Donate to NRO Today


NRO BLOG ROW | BENCH MEMOS |  ARCHIVES    SEARCH    E-MAIL    RSS





July, 2005 Entries


July 31

    • On Being Reasonable
    • Philosophical Moment
    • Where's My Revised Edition?

July 30

    • Left Behind

July 29

    • Response to Andy
    • Mark’s Questions
    • The Process
    • More Questions
    • Media Distortions of Roberts's Executive-Branch Record—Part II
    • Questions and Judicial Ethics
    • The Relevant Comparison,
    • Another Question About Questions
    • Roberts vs. Rehnquist
    • Differences
    • re: "Dumb Ass Questions"
    • A Date Is Set
    • (Partial) Reply to Alt
    • Rome & Roberts
    • Media Distortions of Roberts's Executive-Branch Record
    • "Dumb-ass questions contest"
    • "Do we have to follow Nan Aron off a cliff?"
    • Response to Bradley: A Question of Timing & Context

July 28

    • No illusions
    •  Our Allies on the Left
    • Oh, Margaret!
    • Ramesh's Question About Questions

July 27

    • Amar Misrepresents Roberts
    • The Question of Questions
    • Worrisome Impact
    • More Re: Dellinger on Disclosing SG Office Documents
    • Re: Leahy’s Litmus Test
    • Re: The Da Vinci Code: SCOTUS version
    • Re: Dellinger on Disclosing SG Office Documents
    • Re: Leahy's Litmus Test
    • The Da Vinci Code: SCOTUS Version
    • The Reluctant Cultural Warrior
    • Why Did the White House Release Any Documents?
    • Democrats and Documents
    • Senator Schumer
    • Miranda, Roberts, and the Federalist Society
    • Leahy's Litmus Test
    • Not Many Were Interviewed
    • Dellinger on Disclosing SG Office Documents--Then and Now
    • Judge Roberts: More Common Sense
    • Questions for Roberts
    • Frist Wants August Hearings
    • He's a United, Not a Divider!
    • A Bit of a Response to Matt Franck
    • Ted Kennedy Doesn't Like Us
    • SCOTUS Cannibalism
    • Go Figure
    • Durbin vs. Turley

July 26

    • Schedule for Roberts Hearing
    • I Feel Much Better. . .
    • Bork on Roberts and the Catholic Question
    • Durbin's Dilemma
    • Flattery Will Get You Nowhere
    • Sunstein's Silliness
    • In Response to Matthew Franck
    • Gonzales on Roberts & Roe
    • Are Senate Democrats Anti-Catholic Bigots?
    • Cornyn on Ginsburg
    • Arkes, Clement, and Bush
    • The Secret Handshake
    • White House Confirmation!
    • Polling Roberts
    • Nonsense on Stilts
    • The Senator and the Nominee
    • Testing Catholics

July 25

    • Questions
    • Bring It On. . .
    • SShh
    • Testing
    • Another One for the Common-Sense File
    • NARAL vs. John Roberts
    • Beyond the Internet: Bench TV
    • Durbin: There You Go Again. . .
    • Testing Catholics
    • Check out MSNBC at 12:15
    • Re: ZZZ
    • "No Catholics Need Apply"?
    • ZZZ
    • Defending Miranda's Right
    • Desperate Dems

July 24

    • Questioning
    • re: Questions
    • RE: Whelan on "Sandy's Catch-22"
    • Greens Warming to Roberts?

July 23

    • The Runner-Up
    •  Kerry Seeks Documents
    • Greens Ponder Roberts

July 22

    • Re: Sandy's Catch-22
    • Sandy's Catch-22
    • Schumer's Questions
    • The Question of Questions
    • Sur-reply to Franck
    • Re: I Almost Don't Believe
    • Re: Roberts in Action
    • Estradify
    • Roberts in Action
    • Reply to Alt
    • The French-Fry Flapdoodle
    • Questions, Questions
    • Legal Philosophy Versus Legal Opinion Concerning Cases Which May Come Before the Court
    • A Filibuster By Any Other Name....
    • The Gall of Schumer
    • 6:20
    • Re: the case of Alt v. Franck
    • re: Whelan's Article
    • Delay Is Futile
    • Questioning
    • No Higher Love
    • Roberts and Abortion
    • Don't Answer That Question
    • I Almost Don't Believe
    • RE: Questions
    • And So It Begins
    • It IS Campaign Season
    • David Kirkpatrick Pieces Like

July 21

    • Obama and "Common Sense"
    • Questions
    • GOP's the Thing
    • The Impending Problem
    • Peculiar Patrick
    • Scorched-Earth Tactics
    • Roberts, Harlan, and Roe
    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW--Part VI
    • A Bit of Humor
    • Alert the media!
    • Who Does John Roberts Remind Me Of?
    • Coffin Talk
    • It Takes a Woman to Strip Down to the Real Issue
    • "John G. Roberts is the face of today's governing conservatism."
    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW—Part V
    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW—Part IV
    • I Agree with the Guardian! (Well, Kinda, Sorta)
    • Ramesh vs. Ann Coulter
    • Phew! Okay, I'm Back in My Comfort Zone with Roberts!
    • It's Still Okay to Like John Roberts, Right? Despite?
    • You Don't Say
    • John Roberts and Joseph Story
    • Candor
    • Greenhouse Gas Cloud

July 20

    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW—Part III
    • Flashback: The Left that Cried Wolf
    • Point of Law on Roberts
    • More Silly Women Nonsense
    • Roberts's Donations
    • The Solicitor General of Texas
    • "Were There No Qualified Women?"??!?!!!
    • Your John Kerry Update
    • The American Prospect Goes After Roberts
    • Hewitt Transcript
    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW—Part II
    • Say What?
    • Re: Re: Bum Rap
    • RE: Bench Memos on Network TV
    • Conservatives Are Mainstream? Senator Kennedy, Is That Really You?
    • Go North, Old Man
    • Ann Coulter
    • Feeble, Laughable PFAW
    • Bench Memos
    • Re: “Bum Rap”
    • Enviros Defend Roberts
    • O'Connor on the Roberts Nomination
    • The NYT's Distortion
    • RE: WaPo on Roberts
    • “Bum Rap”
    • re: Lieberman
    • Get a Load
    • This Morning
    • More Radio
    • Indiana Boy
    • Abortion in the Court
    • Boring, But that's Alright
    • Last Night and This Morning
    • What She Said
    • The Harvard Majority
    • Sticking with the Talking Points
    • "A Fight, Maybe, but Not a Battle"
    • The Decision Process: The Clincher
    • Wow

July 19

    • Think Roberts Is Young?
    • Say It Ain't So, Joe
    • Scroll Down
    • Watch for Shannen Coffin on GMA on ABC tomorrow
    • Coffin on Roberts
    • Schumer on Roberts
    • Alberto Gonzales
    • "Dumbass Questions"
    • Roberts Trivia
    • Stop the Madness!
    • Durbin
    • What People for the American Way Is Saying
    • I Know I'm an Obsessed Junkie Type
    • "Looks Like Him"
    • Roberts in His Own Words
    • Bush's Announcement
    • The Knights of Columbus Get Behind the Choice
    • From an RNC Release...Some Good Rounding Up
    • Roberts's Enemies
    • Nan Aron on Roberts
    • Scalia on Roberts
    • The Democratic Responses to the Roberts Pick
    • "I look forward to the Next Step in the Process"...in the Senate
    • Bush Reminds/Tells the Country
    • Bush Gets It
    • "allegedly senator schumer is not happy" with roberts
    • Re: Roberts
    • Roberts on Roe
    • An "Anti-Abortion Group"
    • The D.C. Circuit
    • "In the Ballpark"
    • You'll Be Hearing This A Lot in Coming Days
    • Congratulations, President Bush
    • Cornyn, Not the Nominee, Comments on the Nominee
    • Life In the Family
    • Harry Reid's Lukewarm Statement
    • Another Reason It Should Be Hard to Give Him a Hard Time
    • I Do Love
    • What National Journal has Said About Roberts
    • Confirming Him
    • RE: Roberts
    • Born 1955
    • So I guess
    • it's john roberts
    • re: TradeSports
    • My Question Right Now
    • Tradesports.com Is Going Gaga
    • "If I had to bet a dollar right now..."
    • Brit Hume
    • More Ann Compton
    • Not Luttig?
    • Did Major Garrett Just Say
    • RE: Hewitt
    • RE: Luttig
    • The Case for Edith (Jones)
    • Dark Horses from Off the Bench
    • CNN
    • Hugh Hewitt
    • Sheesh
    • Not Clement
    • Which Woman?
    • Think Progress on Clement
    • "This Would Be War"
    • Clement's Opinions and More
    • What If It Were Ashcroft? Pryor?
    • Charmaine Yoest
    • Bait and Switch?!?
    • Prime Time Pick
    • Clement, Natch
    • Anyone Know Where Janice Rogers Brown Is Right Now?
    • Dems Are Not Being Serious
    • Ediths
    • About Timing
    • It's a Grand Tradition
    • Viewing Clement from the Left
    • re: AP SAYS
    • AP SAYS
    • Would They Bother Telling Bill Frist?
    • RE: Clement
    • Today
    • Nan Aron's Wishes
    • Asked About Edith Clement
    • Bush on SCOTUS
    • More Joy
    • DKos on Clement
    • Re: Joy?
    • RE: RE: Clement
    • RE: Clement
    • The Solid SCOTUS Commentary You Came Here For
    • I Do Love
    • The Clement Buzz
    • If I Were A Betting Woman?
    • The Left's Answer...
    • Joy?
    • Arlen Specter
    • No Intelligence...
    • No Gonzales

July 18

    • A Byrd Veto?
    • Re: The Supreme Court and Foreign Law
    • NYTimes & LaTimes
    • Taylor Contra Gonzales
    • "Extraordinary Circumstances"
    • Candidates
    • Great Minds Think Alike. . .

July 15

    • The Supreme Court and Foreign Law
    • Chief Determination
    • Brains Yes, "Biggest Brain" No
    • RE: Genius Advice
    • Rehnquist Announcement
    • Justice Moore

July 14

    • Rehnquist
    • Lubet’s Conflicting Views on Recusal
    • Thanks, President Clinton!
    • Rehnquist
    • "More Judge Rumors"
    • Senator Hatch on Clinton’s Consultation
    • Today’s Articles on Gonzales and Recusal
    • Genius Advice

July 13

    • Calming Things Down
    • Rehnquist Has Been Hospitalized
    • A Minor Point
    • What Will Rehnquist Do?
    • Are You an Originalist?

July 12

    • Chairman McCain!
    • George Mitchell Back into the Fray?
    • Senate & Consultation
    • Consultation: Great Opening
    • Thank You, Dave!
    • Harry Reid's Advice to the President
    • What Chairman Specter Said
    • Specter Watch
    • Scalia for Chief

July 11

    • On Consultation
    • RE: senators
    • John Kerry on SCOTUS
    • Senators
    • "America Deserves Better"
    • Abortion and "Health"
    • Re: Defense of Gonzales on Recusal
    • Pre-Post-erous Howler of the Day
    • Bill Kristol Has to Be Wrong
    • Go with Whatever Novak Says, Or Follow the K-Lo Indicator
    • People for the American Way Is the Little Guy?
    • Coronate Her!
    • Chick Justice
    • Abortion, Front and Center

July 10

    • Liberal Spin
    • Anti-Constitutionalists

July 09

    • Confusion on the Left

July 08

    • Re: Kennedy for Chief Justice
    • Defense of Gonzales on Recusal
    • Conrad Would Support Gonzales
    • RE: Wit
    • Rehnquist's Wit
    • Slandering the Chief
    • "BUSH GETS TWO"
    • Kennedy for Chief Justice
    • 4:55 Rehnquist Resignation
    • The G-Man
    • Re: Gonzales, Recusal, and Partial-Birth Abortion
    • Rumors, Rumors
    • The Seamless Garment, Once More
    • The First Justice?
    • "The First Justice Who Had Ever Been Pregnant"
    • Gonzales, Recusal, and National Security
    • "Al Gonzales, Abe Fortas and Cronyism"
    • Hope I Didn't Make You Bet on Two Today
    • Stalking Rehnquist
    • D.C. Victories
    • Flashback
    • "Torture Guy" Is Back
    • Really Now. How Many Senators Would You Ever Even Consider Inviting to a Dinner Party?

July 07

    • Re: The Seamless Garment – Again
    • Rehnquist Watch
    • It's Alive!
    • Back to Bork
    • The Specter of Statesmanship
    • The Seamless Garment--Again
    • Just like O'Connor . . .
    • New Source of Worry
    • RE: Gonzales
    • A New Litmus Test?
    • A Media Point on Gonzales
    • "I'm not a candidate"
    • Rovian Genius
    • Sister Souljah, No
    • Bush & Gonzales
    • This Week
    • O'Connor Was the Scotus Rabbi

July 06

    • Same Song Says So Much
    • "Endorsement"
    • Reverse Kerry! He Voted Against Him Before He Voted for Him
    • Reid Meet Reid
    • The Coming Web Attack from the Left
    • "He Has to" Consult
    • “ACTIVISM”
    • Reality TV!
    • RE: That Poll Question
    • Activist Judges?
    • Great Poll Question
    • The Left vs. American Citizens
    • Whose Opportunity Is This Anyway?
    • A SCOTUS Drinking Game
    • Ah Yes, This Perfectly Encapsulates NR's Feelings Toward Gonzales
    • "Left's Last Stand"
    • Schumer's Moment
    • Schumer's Ready to Obstruct
    • Gonzales
    • Disregard
    • Timing and Team
    • Well, These Women Know What They Want

July 05

    • You Have Got To Be Kidding Me
    • Open Minds
    • More on Gonzales and Recusal
    • Error by Consensus
    • Beat on the Extreme Right, Bush! Beat ‘Em Down!

July 04

    • You Gotta Love "Our Guys"
    • Dems Won't Rule Out Filibuster
    • Just More Liberal Reax
    • Ah, Yes…Specter…Specter and the Marbury Myth
    • Specter
    • The Other Justice O’Connor
    • RE: Sunstein

July 03

    • "If he appoints an extremist, he will have a big fight on his hands."
    • O'Connor and the Left
    • From a Feminist Majority E-mail Saturday
    • On Consultation
    • Sunstein on O'Connor
    • A Salute
    • Why Delay a Nomination?

July 02

    • Possible Nominee John Cornyn
    • Uh, This Sounds Like Consultation
    • For the Sake of My Sanity, I Have Believe this Isn't True
    • Consultation vs. Pre-Nomination Veto

July 01

    • Interesting Rumor
    • Re: Specter: Gotta Get a Girl Soon
    • National Right to Life Committee on O'Connor Resignation
    • Make It Like Ginsburg
    • Specter: Gotta Get a Girl Soon [Sigh]
    • More on Consultation
    • Fourth of July Reflections
    • Gonzales Campaign
    • The Battle Is Joined
    • TV Schedule, Continued
    • Tell Us What You Really Think!
    • "Tar and Feather, Inc."
    • Trying to Set the Senate Mood
    • TV Time
    • Things People Are Saying
    • Kerr on O'Connor
    • No Announcement until After G-8
    • Re: On Consultation
    • Shameless NYTimes
    • RE: On Consultation
    • Preserving the Right to Own One's Home
    • Scheduling the Confirmation Hearing
    • The O'Connor Court
    • "Balanced"?
    • Political Labels Don't Fit
    • On Consultation
    • W's Statement
    • Is This "Extraordinary"?
    • Media Signals
    • Greens Gear Up
    • Timing
    • "Conservative Majority" Lost before O'Connor's Retirement
    • Vacancy and Abortion
    • The "Swing" Justice?
    • And So It Begins. . .
    • RE: Rose Garden
    • 11:15
    • Her Letter
    • Deep Breath
    • Expect an O'Connor Resignation Today
    • Re: Condemning Souter's Property

Browse by Month

    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005













 

© National Review Online 2009. All Rights Reserved.

Home | Search | NR / Digital | Donate | Media Kit | Contact Us